Professor Tang Jie: The National Unified Market Is Shenzhen’s Greatest New Opportunity After the Special Zone Policy

Professor Tang Jie: The National Unified Market Is Shenzhen’s Greatest New Opportunity After the Special Zone Policy

Recently, Professor Tang Jie was invited to deliver a keynote speech on new strategic opportunities.
As a respected economist and former Shenzhen leader, Professor Tang Jie is a member of the Board of Directors of The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, holds a bachelor’s, master’s and doctoral degree in economics from Nankai University, is a Fulbright Scholar at the University of Pennsylvania and a visiting professor at the Harvard Kennedy School. He has also served as Secretary-General of Shenzhen Municipal Government, Vice Mayor, and Vice Director of the Standing Committee of Shenzhen Municipal People’s Congress.

With clear and incisive insights, he interpreted the in-depth logic between the national unified market and Shenzhen’s high-quality development.

  1. What the Unified Market Really Wants to Solve

Professor Tang pointed directly to a core pain point:
local “small cycles” have fragmented China’s huge market.

• Regions pursue self-contained industrial chains, poach enterprises, and adopt subsidies that distort market prices

• Severe overcapacity, homogeneous competition, and companies constantly relocating for preferential policies

• China’s enormous economic potential is weakened by administrative barriers

The essence of the unified market:
Not centralized planning, but unified rules, breaking local protectionism, and free flow of production factors.
It means shifting from heavy reliance on exports to strong domestic circulation—where Shenzhen products go to Shanghai, and Shanghai products come to Shenzhen.

  1. Shenzhen’s Transformation: From Building Space to Raising Efficiency

In 45 years, Shenzhen built about 1.1 billion square meters of buildings, driving rapid growth through large-scale investment.
Today, the model has fundamentally changed:

• High-density development is restricted; buildings above 20 stories face limits

• Construction growth will slow; future growth depends on higher output per square meter

• Shenzhen is moving from “expanding scale” to “improving quality, efficiency, and irreplaceability”

Professor Tang’s judgment:
The national unified market is the most favorable national policy for Shenzhen since the end of special zone preferences.

  1. Core Logic: Core-Periphery Structure & Advanced Regions Lead

The unified market does not mean uniform development. It follows a core-periphery pattern:

  1. Pioneer in advanced core regions
    The three major city clusters — Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, Yangtze River Delta, and Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area — account for less than 30% of national population but over 44.8% of GDP, 70% of advanced manufacturing, and two-thirds of invention patents.
  2. The bottleneck is intermediate goods
    Consumer markets are open, but parts, materials, and equipment face the strongest regional barriers. Intermediate goods make up more than 70% of industrial output.
  3. Finer division = larger market = less involution
    Involution = homogeneity and price wars.
    Breakthrough = specialization and irreplaceability.
    Shenzhen’s strength in electronics comes from extreme division of labor and close regional collaboration.
  4. Shenzhen’s Path: Irreplaceability, Not Subsidies

Professor Tang used three classic cases to show Shenzhen’s strategy:

① BYD: Cross-region collaboration, not relocation

BYD expanded heavily in the Yangtze River Delta, but Shenzhen remains the core of R&D and key components.

• Shenzhen: brain and high-end manufacturing

• Yangtze River Delta: precision processing and supporting industries

• Cross-region cooperation turns competition into win-win.

② Unitree Robotics: A small firm leading a national supply chain

A Shenzhen company with ¥1 billion revenue coordinates 135 specialized “little giant” enterprises nationwide:

• Beijing: robot algorithms and systems

• Shenzhen: radar, vision, and control systems

• Yangtze River Delta: high-precision motors, reducers, and components

③ BrainCo: Hangzhou defines problems; Shenzhen solves them

A world-leading non-invasive brain-computer interface company formed a new model:
Hangzhou R&D + Shenzhen manufacturing.
Hangzhou provides top scientists; Shenzhen provides the supply chain and engineers.

  1. Four Key Directions for Shenzhen
  2. Shift from investment attraction to market expansion
  3. Reduce unreasonable subsidies and uphold fair competition
  4. Build irreplaceable advantages in R&D, core components, and system integration
  5. Deepen Shenzhen-Hong Kong integration by unifying standards and systems
  6. Conclusion: The Next Decade Belongs to the National Market

China’s global innovation ranking rose from 35th to 11th in just over a decade, and is expected to enter the top 10 by 2025. The 2035 goal is top 3–5 globally.

The unified market is the key to fully unlocking talent, technology, and market potential.

For Shenzhen:
This is not restriction, but transformation. Not pressure, but the greatest opportunity.
From special zone dividends to unified market dividends, Shenzhen’s next golden era is just beginning.

Read more

3.15之后,为什么我们依然陷入“劣币驱逐良币”的治理泥潭?

3.15之后,为什么我们依然陷入“劣币驱逐良币”的治理泥潭?

导语:每年的3.15晚会都是一场“围观式执法”的盛宴。然而,当聚光灯熄灭,那些被封禁的号、被查封的店,是否真的触及了治理的深层根源?本文尝试拆解这场狂欢背后的三大治理逻辑风险:为什么资质成了护身符?为什么创新成了欺诈的遮羞布?而我们,又为何总是陷入对监管的过度依赖? 一、 资质的悖论:当“护身符”成为“杀人刀” 在今年的3.15案例中,我们再次看到了熟悉的剧本:某自媒体账号披着“医学专家”的外衣,在私域流量池里大肆售卖违规产品。 治理逻辑风险:目前的监管路径高度依赖事前资质审核。平台要求:必须有执业医师证才能发科普视频。这听起来很美,但现实极其残酷——那些大规模违规的群体,往往恰恰具备相关资质。他们利用资质绕过审查,通过“合规”的身份批量生产违规内容,精准收割流量。 代价是显而易见的:真正具备执业素养、想传播真实科学知识的个体,可能因为繁杂的资质认证流程被拒之门外;而具备资质的违规者却在“劣币驱逐良币”的逻辑下疯狂掘金。 核心观点: 治理的根源不应是对内容的先验监管,

By david liu