《网安大咖说》首期拍摄完成
Read more
AI Governance: From Essential Differences to the Reconstruction of Governance Logic
Currently, artificial intelligence has gradually evolved from the stage of auxiliary computing and semantic interaction to the era of autonomous operation and intelligent decision-making of intelligent agents, making scientific and systematic governance imperative. To explore AI governance, we need to first clarify two core issues: first, the essential differences between
海之安网络安全晨报
Post-3.15 Reflection: Why Governance Still Fails to Stop the "Bad Money" from Winning?
Lead-in: Every year, the "3.15 Gala" (World Consumer Rights Day) serves as a grand spectacle of "spectator-style law enforcement." However, when the spotlights dim, do the banned accounts and shuttered stores truly address the deep-rooted causes of the issue? This article attempts to deconstruct three
3.15之后，为什么我们依然陷入“劣币驱逐良币”的治理泥潭？
导语：每年的3.15晚会都是一场“围观式执法”的盛宴。然而，当聚光灯熄灭，那些被封禁的号、被查封的店，是否真的触及了治理的深层根源？本文尝试拆解这场狂欢背后的三大治理逻辑风险：为什么资质成了护身符？为什么创新成了欺诈的遮羞布？而我们，又为何总是陷入对监管的过度依赖？ 一、 资质的悖论：当“护身符”成为“杀人刀” 在今年的3.15案例中，我们再次看到了熟悉的剧本：某自媒体账号披着“医学专家”的外衣，在私域流量池里大肆售卖违规产品。 治理逻辑风险：目前的监管路径高度依赖事前资质审核。平台要求：必须有执业医师证才能发科普视频。这听起来很美，但现实极其残酷——那些大规模违规的群体，往往恰恰具备相关资质。他们利用资质绕过审查，通过“合规”的身份批量生产违规内容，精准收割流量。 代价是显而易见的：真正具备执业素养、想传播真实科学知识的个体，可能因为繁杂的资质认证流程被拒之门外；而具备资质的违规者却在“劣币驱逐良币”的逻辑下疯狂掘金。 核心观点： 治理的根源不应是对内容的先验监管，